Tratsch: Brexit

faxefaxe, 01. Juli 2016, um 14:07

Warum sollte mich völlige Ahnungslosigkeit denn beleidigen? Überhaupt nicht.
Und dieses Mal täuscht Du ja nicht mal Ahnung vor. Mit offenen Karten spielen ist völlig ok

spielfuehrer, 02. Juli 2016, um 20:26

gsoifarad!

Kanalratte, 02. Juli 2016, um 20:49

Wusste gar nicht, dass Alfred Nobel die Wirtschaftswissenschaften so am Herzen lag.

Was man nicht alles lernen kann in diesem Forum.

Ex-Sauspieler #460311, 02. Juli 2016, um 21:19

Hier die Kurzform von Kamis posts:

Wird alles ned so heiss gessen, wies gekocht wird....

SchaulusTIGER, 02. Juli 2016, um 22:02
zuletzt bearbeitet am 02. Juli 2016, um 22:03

Antidemokratische EU-Fanatiker haben heute in London demonstriert - da zeigen sie ihr wahres Gesicht .

SchaulusTIGER, 02. Juli 2016, um 22:03

Felix Austria - die Demokratie hat gesiegt

Ex-Sauspieler #460311, 02. Juli 2016, um 22:20

Kami,
Wir ergänzen uns doch super.

Wenn ich was in nem satz sag und werd misinterpretiert, dann zähl ich auf dich, damit du s den Deppen auführlich erklärst und umgekehrt mach ich's dann bei deinen posts für diejenigen mit lese bzw. Verständnissschwäche.....

Kanalratte, 03. Juli 2016, um 20:42

jo so is`s

wegen Leuchten wie euch sprach Jesus in Gleichnissen.

steffekk, 03. Juli 2016, um 23:02

jetzt bin ich müd

faxefaxe, 04. Juli 2016, um 17:40

Die Realität werden zig kleine Nachrichten wie diese sein, aber keine davon wird dazu führen, dass Du Deine Meinung hinterfragst, weil die ja mehr auf anderen Grundlagen basiert.

http://m.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/unternehmen/traktorhersteller-agco-zieht-europa-zentrale-aus-england-ab-14322061.html

Ex-Sauspieler #460311, 04. Juli 2016, um 18:14

Passt aus britischer Sicht, denk ich

Basic economics (as explained by an economics professor)

Okay we'll go over this one more time!!!! PS I'm guess I would be
the 7th or 8th guy in this story, and I am mad as hell not at the 9th or
10th guy, but at the first 4, (able bodied) who have been drinking for
free all these years without paying their "fair share".

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100.

If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this...

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.

The fifth would pay $1.

The sixth would pay $3.

The seventh would pay $7.

The eighth would pay $12.

The ninth would pay $18.

The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that's what they decided to do.

The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement,

until one day, the owner threw them a curve ball. "

Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20." Drinks for the ten men would now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes.

So the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free.

But what about the other six men?

How could they divide the $20 wind fall so that everyone would get his fair share?

They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33.

But if they subtracted that from every body's share, then the fifth
man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.

So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each
man's bill by a higher percentage the poorer he was, to follow the
principle of the tax system they had been using, and he proceeded to
work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay.

And so the fifth man, like the first four,

now paid nothing (100% saving).

The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% saving).

The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% saving).

The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% saving).

The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% saving).

The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% saving).

Each of the six was better off than before.

And the first four continued to drink for free.

But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings. "I
only got a dollar out of the $20 saving," declared the sixth man.

He pointed to the tenth man, "but he got $10!"

"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man.

"I only saved a dollar too. It's unfair that he received ten times more benefit than me!"

"That's true!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back, when I got only $2?

The wealthy get all the breaks!"

"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison, "we didn't get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!"

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks,

so the nine sat down and had their beers without him.

But when it came time to pay the bill, They discovered something important.

They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and government ministers, is how our tax system works.

The people who already pay the highest taxes will naturally get the most benefit from a tax reduction.

Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore.

In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D. Professor of Economics.

For those who understand, no explanation is needed.

For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

faxefaxe, 04. Juli 2016, um 18:27

das darf man bei uns allerdings viel weniger aussprechen als viele andere Dinge, die man angeblich nicht sagen darf :-)

Ex-Sauspieler #460311, 04. Juli 2016, um 18:51

heisst das,
ich muss schon wieder ne sperre hier auf sauspiel befürchten, faxe²?

faxefaxe, 04. Juli 2016, um 18:55

Das wohl nicht.
Aber es ist schwierig, auf die Thesen, dass die Rentner verarmen, die Scheren immer weiter auseinandergehen und Millionen von Niedriglöhnern im Elend versenken auch nur zu antworten.

Soizhaferl, 04. Juli 2016, um 19:02

...man darf aber schon fragen, ob und wie viel seines geldes Nummer 10 deswegen besitzt, weil 1-4 nichts haben. Auch das ist allein nicht das Ei des Kolumbus, aber das gehört schon auch dazu ;)

(So oder so: "die EU" ist daran allenfalls marginal schuld.)

zur Übersichtzum Anfang der Seite